JUSTICE AND THE POOR. FORMAL vs. INFORMAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS: A GOVERNANCE-BASED APPROACH by
نویسنده
چکیده
Democracy functions as a system with formal and informal institutional interrelated mechanisms serving the purpose of translating social preferences into public policies. Enhancing the effectiveness of society’s dispute resolution mechanisms is also a way to address social preferences through public policies within the judicial domain.1 Therefore, it is necessary to ensure that the institutions responsible for the interpretation and application of laws are able to attract those parties who can’t find any other way to redress their grievances and solve their conflicts.2
منابع مشابه
پرداخت های غیررسمی در بخش سلامت و سیاست های مقابله با آن (یک مطالعه مروری)
Background: Informal payments are paid to individuals /health care providing organizations offering as cash or non-cash and are formed out of formal payment channels. This study aim at identifying the types of informal payments, causes, effects and policies to deal with them. Materials and Methods: This study was a review one and relative published articles identified by searching valid d...
متن کاملMediation and Social Justice: Risks and Opportunities*
Since the earliest days of the “modern mediation field” in the 1970s, there has been a continuous and contentious debate regarding whether the use of mediation poses a threat to the value of justice, at both the individual and social levels.1 Early supporters of the process claimed that it would expand “access to justice,” and thus provide not only administrative savings to the courts but impor...
متن کاملOverview of Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Primer for Judges and Administrators
Introduction This Overview of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is intended to serve as a practical introduction to the various mechanisms for resolving disputes between parties. It is designed to inform deliberations among judges, justice ministry officials, and administrators who are considering the possibility of adding new dispute resolution options to the traditional adjudicative model ...
متن کاملTheoretical review and Planning process of the Relation between Environment, Spatial Justice and Urban Governance
The concept of spatial justice has been widely employed in the recent literature that attempts to deal with concepts and practices of justice from a geographical perspective. However, the concept of spatial justice needs to be recast. Spatial justice could be the most radical offspring of law’s ‘spatial turn’. Spatial justice is arguably the most promising platform on which to redefine, not o...
متن کاملCriminal Abolition and its Impact on Justice as an Ethical Component
Background: Abolitionism has been one of the most influential ideas in criminal law in recent decades. Abolitionism is based on the belief in a moral conviction that life in the community cannot, in fact, be effectively regulated by criminal law, and that the role of the criminal justice system must be significantly reduced, while others have a chance to deal with problem situations, unfinished...
متن کامل